Absolutely not. And the argument that we are taking away Presidential prerogative is not valid. The President has the obligation to submit a balanced budget. But the President may very well say, because of circumstances, we are in a recession or whatever the circumstances, that he recommends that there be this movement away from it. But it is tougher. I say to my friend from Michigan, on this argument as well as the previous argument, when you say we are going to slip and slide, it may be that we will get into the habit of going over 60 votes, but it is better than drifting the way we are right now. And what is the alternative? I have not heard the alternative.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the importance of a balanced budget and the role of the President in budgetary decisions.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
Let me say, with all due respect to my two colleagues, I think things can get worked out over on the House side. We always find a reason not to move ahead. One of the reasons for coming directly to the floor is, frankly, there are people…
Today we reflect on one of the worst crimes against humanity committed in our century: the Turkish massacre of 1/2 million Armenians beginning in 1915. Nationalism based on notions of ethnic purity is not something most Americans…
Such an amendment would be a political mistake. It would allow a mere 40 out of 100 senators and a similar minority in the House to block legislation that would create a deficit. And because the amendment includes no enforcement procedure…
First, on what Senator Simpson says about those of us who are sponsoring this, there was a release by the National Taxpayers Union that took cosponsorship of legislation and added that up, and I looked like a huge spender because, among…





