Absolutely not. And the argument that we are taking away Presidential prerogative is not valid. The President has the obligation to submit a balanced budget. But the President may very well say, because of circumstances, we are in a recession or whatever the circumstances, that he recommends that there be this movement away from it. But it is tougher. I say to my friend from Michigan, on this argument as well as the previous argument, when you say we are going to slip and slide, it may be that we will get into the habit of going over 60 votes, but it is better than drifting the way we are right now. And what is the alternative? I have not heard the alternative.
Sen. Paul Simon: “Absolutely not. And the argument that we are taking away Presidential prerogative is not valid. The President has the…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the importance of a balanced budget and the role of the President in budgetary decisions.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
Yes, it is. If any such right currently exists under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, this Act does nothing to preclude such an action.
I think it is worth reminding ourselves also, as we talk about Martin Luther King, his last effort was in behalf of custodians--janitors, if you will--in Memphis, TN. We have a country today where 23 percent of the children live in…
Just in response to one item mentioned by my friend from Tennessee. He and I agree on Social Security. We differ on the Reid amendment. When he talks about 110 percent of debt versus GDP in 1945 after World War II, what that ignores is…
It ought to be a very rare thing. We can't just be an international Rambo wandering around doing whatever we want regardless of international law.





