Absolutely not. And the argument that we are taking away Presidential prerogative is not valid. The President has the obligation to submit a balanced budget. But the President may very well say, because of circumstances, we are in a recession or whatever the circumstances, that he recommends that there be this movement away from it. But it is tougher. I say to my friend from Michigan, on this argument as well as the previous argument, when you say we are going to slip and slide, it may be that we will get into the habit of going over 60 votes, but it is better than drifting the way we are right now. And what is the alternative? I have not heard the alternative.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the importance of a balanced budget and the role of the President in budgetary decisions.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
as the year progresses, the debate over immigration policy grows more and more heated. Calls for restrictions on immigration--both legal and illegal--are accompanied by claims that immigrants represent a drain on our economy and a threat…
In terms of Social Security, the person who made the point that a balanced budget amendment is the basic protection that is needed by the Social Security system was the chief actuary for the Social Security System for 23 years. I point…
You face a much harsher judge . . . than this committee and that is the judgment of history.
first I respect the sincerity of the President pro tempore and his careful work in this body. I also respect my friend from Oklahoma, Senator Nickles. Let me point out, to just reinforce what Senator Kennedy had to say, that it is those of…





