If I may respond, first, this changes the dimensions of what you do in the Budget Committee. We are not dealing simply with a statute. The Senator and I took an oath when we stood up there to protect the Constitution. This is now part of the Constitution. And when we put that budget together, we know we are not dealing with a statutory thing. We are dealing with requirements that are tough. There is no question it is tough. The Senator from West Virginia said it is tough. But that, I think, will force reality onto us. It does not mean we are always going to guess right. The Senator from West Virginia is absolutely correct. It is difficult. But I think there will be a different tone of reality in the Budget Committee with this kind of provision in the Constitution.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of constitutional requirements on the Budget Committee's work.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
just in response to one item mentioned by my friend from Tennessee. He and I agree on Social Security. We differ on the Reid amendment. When he talks about 110 percent of debt versus GDP in 1945 after World War II, what that ignores is…
first I respect the sincerity of the President pro tempore and his careful work in this body. I also respect my friend from Oklahoma, Senator Nickles. Let me point out, to just reinforce what Senator Kennedy had to say, that it is those of…
I would like to put anybody on notice that there will be an amendment offered by my friend and colleague, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada. Senator Reid, in my opinion, is one of the finest Members of this body. He has shown courage; he does…
Yes, it is. If any such right currently exists under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, this Act does nothing to preclude such an action.





