If I may respond, first, this changes the dimensions of what you do in the Budget Committee. We are not dealing simply with a statute. The Senator and I took an oath when we stood up there to protect the Constitution. This is now part of the Constitution. And when we put that budget together, we know we are not dealing with a statutory thing. We are dealing with requirements that are tough. There is no question it is tough. The Senator from West Virginia said it is tough. But that, I think, will force reality onto us. It does not mean we are always going to guess right. The Senator from West Virginia is absolutely correct. It is difficult. But I think there will be a different tone of reality in the Budget Committee with this kind of provision in the Constitution.
Sen. Paul Simon: “If I may respond, first, this changes the dimensions of what you do in the Budget Committee. We are not dealing simply…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of constitutional requirements on the Budget Committee's work.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
You face a much harsher judge . . . than this committee and that is the judgment of history.
I would point out simply that is the policy of this administration as spelled out in the Wellstone amendment. That is why I am hoping that maybe we can still work out some kind of a compromise with the Senator from Kansas because I do not…
Just in response to one item mentioned by my friend from Tennessee. He and I agree on Social Security. We differ on the Reid amendment. When he talks about 110 percent of debt versus GDP in 1945 after World War II, what that ignores is…
Find compassion in your heart for our most vulnerable and sweetest citizens, our children.





