Forget GAO projections and all the others. Look at the lifetime net tax rates under alternative policies. Under OMB figures in that budget they just gave us, tax rates for someone my age, 1930--I was born in 1928--but let us say 1930 are 30 percent, and for someone-- I want to have the attention of my colleague from Arkansas on this--for future generations, and this is if the health care bill passes and saves all that they project, if we have 10 years of prosperity in a row without a dip, both of which are somewhat questionable, even though I am a cosponsor of the Clinton health program, the administration says 66 to 75 percent of the lifetime earnings of future generations will go for taxation. It is not going to happen. We are going to print money. That is the reality.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses tax rates and projections for future generations in relation to health care policy.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
first, two points made by my friend--and he is my friend--from Nevada, Senator Reid, on the language of our amendment. We have gone over this carefully in all kinds of hearings. The only language change is the Danforth language on judicial…
It ought to be a very rare thing. We can't just be an international Rambo wandering around doing whatever we want regardless of international law.
let me respond just very briefly to my friend and colleague, Senator Kennedy, in his brief remarks. When he says this will result in the President having authority to impound, there is not one word in this amendment that gives the…





