Let me just say again in response, we will take a look at whatever is suggested. We felt the judicial amendment was not necessary, but just to make sure, because there are genuine concerns, as you have expressed and others have, I think we are about to work out something that I think meets that objection. So we will take a look at other amendments. But we also want to be very, very careful because of the nature of what we are doing. We are not just amending some statute that I dreamed up or you dreamed up or someone else did. We are talking about the Constitution. I know my friend from North Dakota has the same feeling of sacredness about the Constitution that we have to proceed with caution.
Sen. Paul Simon: “Let me just say again in response, we will take a look at whatever is suggested. We felt the judicial amendment was not…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance of caution when amending the Constitution.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
You face a much harsher judge than this Committee, and that is the judgment of history, and that judgment is likely to revolve around the question, did you restrict freedom or did you expand it.
Find compassion in your heart for our most vulnerable and sweetest citizens, our children.
I think it is worth reminding ourselves also, as we talk about Martin Luther King, his last effort was in behalf of custodians--janitors, if you will--in Memphis, TN. We have a country today where 23 percent of the children live in…
The offer of funding ... was a last-ditch effort to cover for an inadequate Canadian trade regime that has failed to create a viable market for the products manufactured at Hamilton Works.





