Let me just say again in response, we will take a look at whatever is suggested. We felt the judicial amendment was not necessary, but just to make sure, because there are genuine concerns, as you have expressed and others have, I think we are about to work out something that I think meets that objection. So we will take a look at other amendments. But we also want to be very, very careful because of the nature of what we are doing. We are not just amending some statute that I dreamed up or you dreamed up or someone else did. We are talking about the Constitution. I know my friend from North Dakota has the same feeling of sacredness about the Constitution that we have to proceed with caution.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance of caution when amending the Constitution.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
Yes, it is. If any such right currently exists under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, this Act does nothing to preclude such an action.
I visited the Robert Taylor homes, the area in controversy, on Monday morning. I took no reporters with me, no television cameras, so I could just talk to the people who are in that area. Overwhelmingly, they want the police to do the job…
first of all, I congratulate my colleague on becoming a grandfather. I am pleased to have him join the ranks. Talk about taxation without representation, that little grandchild of yours faces that.
It says that someone born when I was born, 1930--I was born in 1928, I will spend about 30 percent of my lifetime income on taxation. But when you get down to future generations and, if you assume every projection in terms of their…





