let me respond to the remarks made last evening by the distinguished President pro tempore, one of the finest Members to have ever served in this body, Senator Robert Byrd. I have great respect for Senator Byrd and I ordinarily agree with Senator Byrd. But this time we are in sharp disagreement. First of all, when I said that a constitutional amendment expresses philosophy and prevents Government abuse, he said that a constitutional amendment--if I am quoting him correctly--does not express philosophy. I differ. And what we are saying with this amendment is we have to have pay-as-you-go Government. But I think there is a philosophy behind almost all amendments. The first amendment giving us freedom of speech--that expresses, really, a philosophy that if we have ideas out here freely flowing about, that in the process we are going to pick the best ideas. I think that is a philosophy.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses a disagreement with Senator Byrd regarding the philosophical implications of constitutional amendments.
Share
More from Sen. Paul Simon
The answer is we will occasionally do so, and for those who say what about a recession, since 1962 we have had 11 stimulus packages pass the U.S. Senate. All of them passed with more than 60 votes.
first, two points made by my friend--and he is my friend--from Nevada, Senator Reid, on the language of our amendment. We have gone over this carefully in all kinds of hearings. The only language change is the Danforth language on judicial…
I thank my colleagues, particularly Senator Kennedy, the chairman of the committee, and Senator Durenberger, who has been very helpful on this, as well as other things. We would not have the Direct Lending Program today but for Senator…
what this amendment proposes is very simple: That we appoint a three-member privacy commission with no more than 25 employees, $1.5 million authorization the first year that would take a look at the whole question of privacy in our…





