the U.S. is not currently the global leader in weather forecasting.
I want to absolutely echo your point that we need to be goal- rather than path-focused.
Our colleagues over in the Intelligence Committee right now are defending the Constitution from the White House.
We are asked to trust that people led by science deniers are going to make that decision right.
It's fundamentally disingenuous to assert, as EPA has, that the rule will not be applied retroactively to existing regulations.
When we politicize the Constitution, we put our republic at jeopardy, and when we politicize science, we put our species in jeopardy.
If my cell phone is any predictor, this is not the Committee hearing that most of the country is watching today.
You cannot be happy that your leadership has put you in a position to defend an anti-scientific history.
Congresswoman Brownley had asked whether a carbon tax or fee or something like that would be appropriate.
My view is that its super easy to solve the climate crisis. We only have to do three things.
I introduced H.R. 3623 with Representative Cartwright.