On the recordNovember 12, 2019
It's fundamentally disingenuous to assert, as EPA has, that the rule will not be applied retroactively to existing regulations.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Casten argues against EPA's claim regarding the proposed rule's retroactive application.
Share
More from Sean Casten
Jan 18, 2024
This month marks the 51st anniversary of Roe v. Wade. That decision, which recognized women's individual right to bodily autonomy, has now been supplanted by a Supreme Court that effectively said that the Federal Government isn't here to…
Sep 26, 2023
There was a time in Washington less than a year ago when if the Speaker of the House of Representatives gave you their word, it meant something. That is no longer true. Earlier this year, Speaker McCarthy stood in the Oval Office with the…
Jul 18, 2023
Can we maintain an affordable, reliable, and decarbonized grid if we rely only on traditional renewables? To hear our Republican colleagues talk, absolutely not. They say that nuclear and advanced fossil fuels and hydrogen all have to be…
Feb 15, 2024
Should we increase global warming? Should we do all of that just so that the natural gas industry can make more money selling U.S. resources to Asia--not to Europe, because that is where the margin is going. Or should we maintain the…
Other voices in this conversation
