As the gentleman probably remembers, last year when we voted on our budget for the United States, they projected a deficit at that point of a little north of $300 billion. Then they brought up the investment of $87 billion in Iraq after the fact, so it was not included in the budget, because it would have made the deficit look far worse. So this year we are going to vote on a budget that has a $500 billion-plus deficit, nearly half a trillion dollars, and then we will get the request for the war in Iraq, an additional $50 billion put on. It is basically playing real quick with the hands.
Rep. Rahm Emanuel: “As the gentleman probably remembers, last year when we voted on our budget for the United States, they projected a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the projected budget deficits and war funding during a budget debate.
Share
More from Rep. Rahm Emanuel
I do appreciate your conversion on the road to Damascus as it relates to fiscal responsibility and spending. And I do believe that after we've seen the highest increase in the Nation's debt in the shortest period of time under a Republican…
No conversation about trade is ever about trade. It's about the standard of living of the middle class of this country. Globalization could be a good thing if you have an agenda, and just trade alone is not an agenda to make sure that the…
Here it states, ``37 million Americans get their daily drinking water.'' It's the largest body of fresh water in North America. In fact, it's 90 percent of the water as it relates to body water. In that effort, this is a bipartisan effort…
First of all, it wasn't part of welfare reform. Welfare reform had a 1-year transitional for Medicaid. It wasn't part of that, which is a point you made. Second is, SCHIP was so successful, while the rest of the population actually had an…





