On the recordFebruary 13, 2013
My comments were designed to illustrate the very difficult trade-offs. There is no party that has a monopoly on empathy or sympathy here with respect to pursuing tax reform.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Roskam emphasizes the complexity and bipartisan nature of tax reform discussions.
Share & report
More from Peter Roskam
May 18, 2018
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of subtitle F of title XI, add the following (and make such conforming changes as…
Jun 19, 2018
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, in closing, in a nutshell, I think the gentlewoman from California put it well. What she was arguing was this bill strikes a balance, which it does. It is designed to focus…
Jun 19, 2018
Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 5773) to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require Medicare prescription drug plans to establish drug management programs for at-risk beneficiaries, require…
Jun 19, 2018
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 5723, the Expanding Oversight of Opioid Prescribing and Payment Act of 2018, sponsored by my colleague, Representative Tenney, along with…
Other voices in this conversation
