I have now served 24 years on the Finance Committee, and the last 20 years has been a continued frustration in our disinclination and refusal to make the research and development credit permanent. It is elemental that research projects go beyond 2, 4, or 20 years. It is elemental and in the interest of society that these projects should take place. We allow the credit to be taken but only in 2-year intervals, as it were, such that there will obviously be some decisions made that it is too risky and maybe they won't do it next time. We always renew it, but at a cost. There is an efficiency cost which is clear. I, for one, will happily vote in support of the Senator's proposal.
Patrick Moynihan: “I have now served 24 years on the Finance Committee, and the last 20 years has been a continued frustration in our…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a permanent research and development credit during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Patrick Moynihan
Everyone can have their own opinions about policy, but there is only one law of numbers and one rule of arithmetic
When a security official--officials--tell you something is classified, don't believe them.
The news from the Middle East is deeply painful to all who pray for the peace of Jerusalem. Three months ago at Camp David the State of Israel offered the Palestine Authority unprecedented concessions in an effort to end the cycle of…
May I simply thank my revered friend. We have been together, even across the aisle, for a near quarter century. There is no one whose regard I greater value and whose remarks I could not be more moved by.





