I certainly could attempt to do so. I would not risk overstatement. There would be a setting in which, having given the President negotiating authority for a new round of international trade talks, having arranged for Trade Adjustment Assistance to be continued as it has been for 37 years, we could say: The particular matters before us will be part of the trade negotiations--and so forth. We could say we will get to it next year. But we don't have that negotiating authority. The President goes to Seattle emptyhanded. The only thing he can bring with him is the trade legislation we have before us--which we still have to take to the House. But this is all the United States can show the world, the world which has been following us for all these years. So I hope, at a very minimum, the sense of tradition--even, if I may say, of honor--will drive us forward in this matter.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of trade negotiations and the President's authority in international trade.
Share
More from Patrick Moynihan
I say to our chairman, as evidenced by the fact that this measure was reported 19-1 in the Finance Committee. I thank the Chair. We are at a moment of history and the omens are excellent.
Since the 1930s, section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930, and the Smoot-Hawley tariff, has made it illegal to send prison labor products to this country. If it still continues to be done, doesn't that problem involve our vigilance? Shouldn't…
It is the best hope of mankind at this moment, sir, because the age of nuclear warfare is not over. If we think we have proliferation today, wait until we see. We won't, but if we were to announce that we want the Chinese on hold, I cannot…
could I respond in the most emphatically sympathetic and supportive way to the statement of the Senator from Texas. In 1993, this Congress passed legislation to create the Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy in the…





