although there was considerable support for the legality of the provision, I thought it best to proceed with caution in these circumstances. These are matters of human rights under international law, on which we have rightly lectured others, and involve our solemn obligations under treaties. I sought the views of other experts. Letters concluding that the expatriation provision did not raise any problems under international law were received from Prof. Detlev Vagts of Harvard Law School and Prof. Andreas F. Lowenfeld of New York University School of Law. The State Department issued a lengthier analysis upholding the legality of the provision, and the American Law Division of the Congressional Research Service reached a like conclusion. However, there were dissenting views, most notably Prof. Hurst Hannum of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, who first wrote to me on March 24.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legality of a provision related to human rights under international law.
Share
More from Patrick Moynihan
If we found a Chinese gunboat on the Missouri, we might say: I think you got your charts wrong here. This is U.S. waters, not yours. It is easy for us to forget because there was no indignity done us. It is not easy for them. I am not…
If I might say, these amendments get 18 votes, 22 votes; we now have a pattern. The Senate made its decision about this legislation midday. The sooner we are in the aftermath, the better relations will be, and the Senate can go on to other…
Would he know that the current best estimate is that the GDP of Russia is now approximately that of Switzerland?
could I respond in the most emphatically sympathetic and supportive way to the statement of the Senator from Texas. In 1993, this Congress passed legislation to create the Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy in the…





