it is again an honor and a privilege to join with one of the great constitutionalists in the history of the U.S. Senate, Robert C. Byrd, who has written the history of the Senate. I can so well remember the occasion on which that great volume was introduced. One of our finest American historians was present saying that it is difficult to understand and very hard to forgive that there has been so little scholarly attention given to this body, to the Congress, as against the Presidency, and suggesting that it is not hard to explain. There is only one President, and there are 435 of us--a more complicated subject that comes later in our historymaking. But I think it may be said that in the history of relations between the Congress and the Presidency there has never been an issue equal in importance to the constitutional challenge we face with the Line-Item Veto Act.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the significance of the Line-Item Veto Act and the relationship between Congress and the Presidency.
Share
More from Patrick Moynihan
I know Senator Roth will join me in expressing great gratitude and appreciation for Senator Warner's characteristic generosity. It comes from the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, which is doubly important. Mr. President, we are…
Sir, I would like to speak to the matter that the Senator from West Virginia has addressed from the perspective of the Finance Committee. I think the Senator will agree that most of the budget of the Federal Government goes through the…
on this last day of the 106th Congress I would ask to be allowed a moment of reminiscence and farewell. Come January 3--deo voluntus, as the Brothers used to teach us--I will have served four terms in the United States Senate, a near…
I will not require more than a few moments to thank my friend from New Jersey and express confidence in the Senators from Massachusetts and Delaware who have just spoken, to thank the distinguished chairman of the Appropriations Committee…





