But isn't that--go back to the Constitution. Now you are disagreeing with two out of three branches.
Mike Quigley: “But isn't that--go back to the Constitution. Now you are disagreeing with two out of three branches.”
Editor's note · Context
Quigley questions the interpretation of the courts regarding constitutional matters.
Share
More from Mike Quigley
President Trump's first Defense Secretary, Jim Mattis, once said: If we don't fully fund the State Department and diplomacy abroad, I need to buy more ammunition. Apparently, Elon Musk, a newly minted oligarch with $20 billion in…
Last week the House and Senate oversaw the certification of the 2024 election. It was a quick, smooth process. There were no riots, no violence. We completed the peaceful transfer of power as the Founding Fathers envisioned it. Now compare…
Today, as in every day, we open the House with the Pledge of Allegiance and the words ``with liberty and justice for all.'' However, some of our Nation's greatest ills have come from moments when we have chosen to make exceptions to…





