On the recordJanuary 23, 2011
But isn't that--go back to the Constitution. Now you are disagreeing with two out of three branches.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Quigley questions the interpretation of the courts regarding constitutional matters.
Share
More from Mike Quigley
Jun 28, 2024
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XX, this 5- minute vote on the motion to recommit will be followed by 5-minute votes on: Passage of H.R. 8774; A…
Apr 9, 2024
Chairman, do you want to have them all testify so that we can just ask any of them? Just a suggestion.
Jan 14, 2025
This bill is a cynical scapegoating of a vulnerable population. To make matters worse, it is a hateful attack on kids. Trans kids deserve to play sports just like their peers, and Congress can't bar them from the field. All young people…
Mar 11, 2025
There is a national shortage of more than 7 million units of affordable housing across America and more than 771,000 people experiencing homelessness. This CR does nothing to lower the cost of housing. That is what I was going to talk…
Other voices in this conversation
