The economic and national security justifications provided by GSA remain insufficient, and I am encouraged that the GSA's inspector general is investigating this sudden reversal.
Editor's note · Context
Quigley questions the justifications for the GSA's decision and supports an investigation.
Share & report
More from Mike Quigley
Mr. Chairman, do we really want to target dedicated public servants and threaten their livelihoods because we disagree with them? These public servants are doing their jobs, carrying out the policy of the administration they serve. They…
Madam Chairman, I yield to the gentlewoman from Massachusetts (Ms. Clark), the distinguished Democrat whip and former member of the Appropriations Committee.
Mr. Chair, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Wasserman Schultz), the ranking member of the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Subcommittee. {time} 1830
Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to yet another attack on scientific consensus and on evidence-based approaches to addressing our climate reality. This amendment would prohibit any agency funded in this bill from considering the…





