The entire premise of the bill is wrongheaded.
Editor's note · Context
Quigley criticizes the foundational assumptions of the bill regarding race-based abortions.
Share & report
More from Mike Quigley
Madam Chairwoman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler), the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee.
Madam Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment and its attack on the resources of Democratic and Republican mayors, Governors, and county officials who rely on this to close the gap in funding for housing and infrastructure needs in…
Mr. Chairman, we now enter the theater of the absurd. Again, for the second day in a row, let's have two White people talk about racial equality in the United States because we know so much about it from having, oh, so much experience, but…
Madam Chair, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio will be postponed. Amendment No. 36 Offered by Ms. Blunt Rochester The…





