I had the honor of serving with the gentleman from California on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for 8 years. I had an in-the-ring view of his work. Obviously, it is not what Mr. Schiff did that was wrong, it is what he did so well. That is what bothers the majority. He defended our country from threats, foreign and domestic. He defended the rule of law. He defended our democracy at one of its most critical and pivotal points. He held the ethically and legally challenged former President accountable. What really gnaws on the majority and what really bothers them is that Mr. Schiff was way better than anybody on their team at debate, at leadership, at messaging, and at legal knowledge. He kicked their ass. He was better, he was more effective, and that still bothers them. They couldn't beat him on the field, so they voted him off. We voted people off committees because they posted threats, not because they can't compete. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Members are reminded to refrain from profanity in their remarks.
Share & report
More from Mike Quigley
It can only be described as disgraceful to target dedicated public servants and threaten their livelihoods. Our government is dependent on their skills and their dedication to the job to help this country go forward. Ms. Gordon has been a…
I am not sure how to phrase this, but I would ask the sponsor of this amendment, through the Chair, a question. I believe he referred to the Secretary of Transportation's name. I wasn't sure I heard that correctly. If the Chair could ask…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from South Carolina will be postponed. Amendment No. 65 Offered by Mr. Norman The Acting CHAIR…
My colleague is already trying to undo the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which included funding to improve and expand ferry service in rural and urban communities across the country. These funds allow places like Georgia, Representative…





