Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 3, 2011
Today I am pleased to join Senator Whitehouse, Senator Boxer and a growing list of my colleagues in support of the Whitehouse-Kirk-Boxer amendment that will improve airline safety throughout the Nation. Most individuals are familiar with laser pointers that are often used in presentations. What you may not know is the growing danger these devices pose to pilots. Last month, the FAA released nationwide data on lasers pointed at aircraft. From 2009 to 2010, incidents nearly doubled from 1,527, to 2,836. To show how quickly this has become a problem, when the FAA first began to track this problem in 2005, incidents were under 300. Transportation Secretary LaHood has acknowledged this is a serious safety issue. Lasers can temporarily blind pilots, which is incredibly dangerous, but even more so during the critical time of takeoff and landing. Advancements in laser technology also are making the problem worse. Certain color variations, such as green lasers, are 35 times brighter than comparable red lasers. This is a particular worry for me and for my State's busiest airport--O'Hare. According to the FAA, last year O'Hare had the second-highest number of laser events in the Nation at 98. The Whitehouse-Kirk-Boxer amendment creates new penalties for knowingly pointing a laser pointer at an aircraft, or at the flight path of an airplane. Commonsense exemptions are provided to allow further research and testing activities.
Said by
Mark Kirk
Republican · Illinois
Source
govinfo.gov
Feb 3, 2011

Editor's note · Context

The speaker addresses the dangers of laser pointers to airline safety and supports an amendment to enhance penalties for such actions.

Share

More from Mark Kirk

Sep 20, 2016

The only conceivable purpose for this money is to finance illicit activities, because the cash is untraceable.

congress.gov
Jul 12, 2016

Interoperability is 'The ability of a system to work with and use another system.'

congress.gov
Jul 12, 2016

I would say you could expect some further definition from this committee on that point, that we need to move forward on this point to make sure there is no net burden on the soldier and sailor when they come out of the Service.

congress.gov
Jul 12, 2016

If we had a veteran who had a spot on his lung indicating cancer, the Joint Legacy Viewer would not share that with the VA so VA would not know about that emerging cancerous situation, is that correct?

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation