I would like to add that unlike the experience that the United States had in the Marshalls in the fifties, there is ample evidence that this is risky. This is something that is occurring some 40 years after the testing in the Marshall Islands, and perhaps we could excuse some of the earlier testing because we were unsure about the consequences. But in this particular instance we are very sure of the consequences, but France proceeded without any respect, without any attention to the kinds of outrage which were expressed in the Pacific. I would like to commend again the gentleman from American Samoa for his diligent work on this issue and his leadership on this issue.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the risks of nuclear testing in the Pacific and commending a colleague's efforts.
Share
More from Lauren Underwood
The U.S. Constitution grants the Federal Government the sole authority to control immigration and secure the Nation's border. That includes determining who is allowed to enter the country and how the borders are to be secured. This is for…
Last November, I joined my Democratic colleagues in sending a letter to President Biden to urge him to designate the Palestinian territories for temporary protected status and/or authorize Deferred Enforcement Departure for Palestinians in…
I oppose this amendment not because I support the remain in Texas concept but because we are debating nonsense. This policy never happened. Why are we wasting time debating amendments to prohibit the implementation of nonexistent policies…
I missed the vote on the Democratic Motion to Recommit H.R. 7637, as I was en route from the Appropriations Committee Markup of the FY 2025 Energy and Water, and Related Agencies bill. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll…





