I too am pleased to speak in support of H.R. 3389, a bill to reauthorize the national sea grant program. I would also like to take this time to express my strong support for the National Sea Grant College Program, my support for the manager's amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 3389 which requires an annual report of the progress of institutions and regional associations seeking to develop sea grant status, and my opposition to the administration's plan to move the National Sea Grant College Program from NOAA to the National Science Foundation. Before discussing my specific concerns, I want to commend the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Gilchrest), the chairman of the Subcommittee on Fisheries, Conservation, Wildlife and Oceans, and the gentleman from New York (Mr. Boehlert), the chairman, and the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Hall), the ranking member, of the Committee on Science, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Ehlers) and their staffs for their sincere efforts to work cooperatively to develop a consensus bill which represents a fair and satisfying compromise to improve the act. On a related aside, I find the consideration of the sea grant legislation today to be somewhat ironic.
Editor's note · Context
Speaking in support of H.R. 3389 to reauthorize the national sea grant program.
Share
More from Lauren Underwood
First, these policies should be debated in a different context, on a different bill. DHS' role here is guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. DHS does not develop independent policies on these issues, but, rather…
Last November, I joined my Democratic colleagues in sending a letter to President Biden to urge him to designate the Palestinian territories for temporary protected status and/or authorize Deferred Enforcement Departure for Palestinians in…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Tennessee will be postponed. Amendment No. 46 Offered by Mr. Ogles The Acting CHAIR. It is…
The use of facial recognition technology, which is still a fairly new capability, requires robust oversight and internal controls, including a privacy impact assessment by DHS's privacy office. I know that the Department of Homeland…





