there is no doubt that the underlying bill is worthy of support. However, the language contained within, which prohibits funds from being utilized for Kosovo operations next year, will destroy the faith in the peace accords that were just yesterday agreed to. Section 1006, as drafted by the Republican majority, will prohibit any funding authorized under this act from being used for the current NATO operations in Kosovo. While almost impossible to enforce and monitor, this section has a demoralizing effect upon the morale and welfare of our troops engaged in the NATO operations. This section is completely unnecessary and sends the wrong message to our allies and troops. I applaud Congressman Skelton's efforts to strike this language. The insidious language built into this bill is there for the purpose to embarrass the President and his efforts to broker peace in the Balkans. As this operation was conducted on the basis of coalition forces, it is absolutely essential that American forces participate without any hesitation. This spending "road block" may prevent military peace keeping planners and commanders from placing necessary equipment in place to do the job and do it right.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about funding restrictions for NATO operations in Kosovo.
Share
More from Lauren Underwood
I oppose this amendment not because I support the remain in Texas concept but because we are debating nonsense. This policy never happened. Why are we wasting time debating amendments to prohibit the implementation of nonexistent policies…
Safe Mobility Offices are strategically situated in Central and South America and intended to be an alternative way for individuals to seek lawful pathways to the United States other than the dangerous journey that many migrants resort to…
Last November, I joined my Democratic colleagues in sending a letter to President Biden to urge him to designate the Palestinian territories for temporary protected status and/or authorize Deferred Enforcement Departure for Palestinians in…
I voted incorrectly today. However, if I had voted as I intended, I would have voted ``YEA'' on Roll Call No. 492, the passage of H.R. 5349.





