I rise in reluctant favor of this bill, which makes emergency appropriations for fiscal year 2000. Notwithstanding my support for the $2 billion package for the costs of the U.S. peacekeepers in Kosovo or the paltry, yet sorely needed $854 million for the Pentagon's embattled health-insurance system, I have serious concerns over the Colombia supplemental package. The $1.7 billion package of counter-narcotics and development assistance for the Andean region, principally Colombia may be spending too much money in the wrong places. Let's briefly list what this package includes: Assistance for Colombian Army Counter-narcotics Battalions [``Push into Southern Colombia'' program]. This includes 33 Huey helicopters and 28 UH-60 (Blackhawk) helicopters, along with training, operations and maintenance and related equipment. Assistance for Colombian National Police--2 UH-60 helicopters; a spray aircraft; base construction; upgrade of existing aircraft; and provision of intelligence. Narcotic interdiction assistance for Colombia and neighbors in the region. Some economic development including crop substitution, employment, and resettlement. A modicum of human rights protection, democratic governance, judicial reform and the peace process.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing emergency appropriations and concerns over U.S. aid to Colombia during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Lauren Underwood
While I can support additional funding for DHS components in fiscal year 2025, I must respectfully oppose this amendment. We are debating increasing a multibillion dollar agency by a miniscule amount at the detriment of the Office of the…
This is yet another cruel and inhumane attempt by the majority to penalize legal immigrants for accessing health benefits and other government services available to them. The amendment attempts to revert to a Trump-era public charge rule…
I claim the time in opposition. The Acting CHAIR. The gentlewoman from Illinois is recognized for 5 minutes.
I voted incorrectly today. However, if I had voted as I intended, I would have voted ``YEA'' on Roll Call No. 492, the passage of H.R. 5349.





