I have been part of a group of Members from both sides of the aisle and from both Chambers who have been meeting actually over the past few months to try to find common ground on SCHIP legislation. I am afraid that some of the facts that the gentleman from Wisconsin stated, he made some statements that I would hope he would join our group and we could go over those facts, such as the $83,000. For my colleagues who have taken part, they know very well that these discussions that we have been having were productive at times and less productive at other times. But despite our disagreements and the bumps in the road, I think we persisted and continued to meet because we believe this is one of the most important issues that Congress will address. The genesis of these meetings originated from a letter that 38 House Republicans sent to the President on October 18, and in that letter we laid out principles that we believed would be necessary to secure our votes on the legislation and make this truly a bipartisan reauthorization of SCHIP.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing bipartisan efforts on SCHIP legislation during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Judy Biggert
At this time, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Dold), a member of the committee.
I thank the gentleman. I will always think of you as the green man from Colorado. Now I would like to yield to the gentleman from Pennsylvania, Mr. Todd Platts, who is also retiring.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise this morning in support of the motion to instruct offered by my good friend Mrs. Davis from California. This measure would ensure that the Afghan Women and Girls Security Promotion…
I thank the chairman for giving me this time. Madam Speaker, I rise in support of this conference report and wish to address particularly title II, which would reauthorize for 5 years the National Flood Insurance Program, or NFIP. There…





