So, I mean, my point is, what makes you believe that another consent-based approach somewhere in this country is not going to end up 30 years later and $15 billion in the hole just like we have right now at Yucca Mountain?
Shimkus expresses skepticism about the feasibility of new consent-based nuclear waste approaches.
Share
More from John Shimkus
I oppose the Delgado amendment. Beware of a wolf in sheep's clothing. This is not a technical fix or a clarification of last year's NDAA. There were no colloquies, report language, or public statements rejecting TRI exemptions for PFAS in…
Another group that I would like to pause and thank is my campaign team and supporters. It is amazing how diverse this group is. They are young and old; they are rich and poor; they live in towns, villages, and isolated country roads. While…
Today, I rise to thank those young men and women who have served the people of Illinois and the country as staff assistants, legislative correspondents, and legislative assistants. I include in the Record a list of their names. Blanford…
Who has the right to close? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York has the right to close.
Other voices in this conversation
