as we continue to debate campaign finance reform some of my colleagues continue to press for free air time. Some of the legislation we will be considering requires broadcasters to sell time to candidates at 50 percent below the already discounted rate. I really do not think they have carefully considered the consequences of this issue. The first problem is that it will not necessarily reduce campaign spending. What would stop a candidate from buying twice as many spots? Secondly, the glut of commercials will simply turn voters off. A survey by Opinion Research Corporation last year showed that 61 percent of adults do not want more campaign ads on TV or radio. What do they want? They want more debates and news coverage, all of which are currently provided by broadcasters for free. Mr. Speaker, Congress needs to take a step back, let the voters decide and allow the best candidate to win.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about proposed campaign finance reform and the impact of free air time for candidates.
Share
More from John Shimkus
Congress declared that quantity was not the true measure of whether EPA was doing its job, but, rather, the quality of the work it was doing.
Another group that I would like to pause and thank is my campaign team and supporters. It is amazing how diverse this group is. They are young and old; they are rich and poor; they live in towns, villages, and isolated country roads. While…
Staff assistants are the first person a visitor sees or hears in my D.C. office. First impressions are lasting impressions, so even though they are the lowest on the totem pole, they are very important. Staff assistants welcome visitors…
It is critical that if we are going to spend money to make sure our water is safe, we use science and we don't use emotion.





