I'm glad we are talking about healthy beaches. As I said earlier, one of the most damaging aspects about healthy beaches is an oil spill, and one way to limit the risk of oil spills is to become more self-reliant, and I know my colleague would appreciate it because he does a lot of renewal, and it's great work, but renewable alone can't fill the future demand. In fact, it really only nibbles around the edges. I'm also glad we're opening up the discussion to climate change because the reality is is that climate change will cost the American public, and it's going to cost us big bucks. And those of us on our side who are willing to go into debate just hope that there's some honest discussion on the real costs needed. I'm not a big cap-and-trade guy. I think it's a game by which we're going to play with the consumers hiding the real cost. Chairman Dingell, intellectually honest, said, let's add 50 cents a gallon to gasoline to help pay for the climate change cost.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of climate change and energy costs during a floor speech.
Share
More from John Shimkus
I thank my colleague for yielding me the time. We should at least comply with the law. I would think that a law- writing body, Congress, and the Appropriations Committee should at least follow the law. Well, again, this rule doesn't do…
I think it would be helpful if we would focus on the ones that we know are bad, the PFOA and PFOS.
I thank my colleague and next-door neighbor from Kentucky for yielding to me. Mr. Speaker, the legislative director, together with the legislative staff, advises congressmen on legislative issues. This position assists in the development…
Thirty-five years ago, Congress decided EPA was not regulating enough contaminants in drinking water.





