Yes. My time is expired, but I guess that is the point of a hearing to identify if you want to do a legislative fix to make sure there is greater transparency and give you the authority to do that.
Editor's note · Context
Shimkus suggests the hearing aims to address transparency issues in the program.
Share
More from John Shimkus
The American people overwhelmingly agree. Recent polling found Americans prioritize affordability and reliability over emissions reductions.
As folks in the Chamber know, I have been taking some time to thank friends, family, and staff, for supporting me these 24 years as a Member of the House. Today, before I go down the organizational chart and mention caseworkers…
It is no surprise that we have the law of the land for failure of the appropriators to spend the money.
I oppose the Delgado amendment. Beware of a wolf in sheep's clothing. This is not a technical fix or a clarification of last year's NDAA. There were no colloquies, report language, or public statements rejecting TRI exemptions for PFAS in…





