Shortcuts lead to dead ends, and I am concerned that the proposed measure that focused solely on interim storage without integrating it into a permanent system for disposal may sound good and expedient, but they will not work, and they may actually harm ratepayers and taxpayers in the long run.
On the recordJune 12, 2019
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Expressing concerns about interim storage measures for nuclear waste without permanent solutions.
Share
More from John Shimkus
Jul 23, 2020
I claim the time in opposition. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized for 5 minutes.
Jul 27, 2020
Congress declared that quantity was not the true measure of whether EPA was doing its job, but, rather, the quality of the work it was doing.
Sep 23, 2020
I thank the gentleman for yielding. It is great to be with my friends on the floor. I saw an E&E story earlier this week titled ``House divided over impact, wisdom of clean energy bill.'' Where but in D.C. can you take an 8-page bill and…
Jul 23, 2020
Who has the right to close? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York has the right to close.





