On the recordSeptember 9, 2013
Your answer to his question was no, that it was not science-based, it was a politically based decision.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Shimkus criticized a decision as politically motivated rather than based on science.
Share
More from John Shimkus
Jul 23, 2020
I claim the time in opposition. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Illinois is recognized for 5 minutes.
Jul 27, 2020
Thirty-five years ago, Congress decided EPA was not regulating enough contaminants in drinking water.
Oct 2, 2020
Since last Friday, I have been working in good faith to find a path forward on a bill to ban asbestos. Democrats ended that effort yesterday evening. The bill passed the Energy and Commerce Committee with bipartisan support last November…
Jul 30, 2020
Deb Detmers Fansler, Steve Tomaszewski, and Rodney Davis were all with me politically and governmentally for 24 years. It is now my time to thank them. All three have been great public servants. All three are political addicts. Deb is…
Other voices in this conversation
