while the other side is becoming increasingly hysterical every time evidence is unearthed, I would ask my Democratic friends a few questions. What do you suppose Webster Hubbell meant when he said on tape, so I need to roll over one more time? Again, for the benefit of those on the other side who may be too busy attacking and smearing everyone whose job it is to uncover the truth, I ask them, what do they think convicted felon Webster Hubbell meant when he said, ``So I need to roll over one more time.'' Or, ``I will not raise those allegations that might open it up to Hillary.'' What about Mrs. Hubbell's statements about overbilling that, ``That would be one area Hillary would be vulnerable.'' Is this not evidence of crime? Is this not relevant to the investigation now ongoing? Can we not agree that our citizens deserve the truth and that no citizen is above the law?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of statements made by Webster Hubbell during a discussion on legal accountability.
Share
More from John Shimkus
It is our responsibility as policymakers to closely examine the costs, the effectiveness, and other impacts of the environmental policies that affect energy.
I don't think we want to impose California's green new normal on the rest of the Nation.
Another group that I would like to pause and thank is my campaign team and supporters. It is amazing how diverse this group is. They are young and old; they are rich and poor; they live in towns, villages, and isolated country roads. While…
Today, I rise to thank those young men and women who have served the people of Illinois and the country as staff assistants, legislative correspondents, and legislative assistants. I include in the Record a list of their names. Blanford…





