Political Quotes

On the recordMay 24, 2016
I have a motion at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the motion. The text of the motion is as follows: Mr. Shimkus moves that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 2576 with an amendment inserting the text of Rules Committee Print 114-54, modified by the amendment printed in House Report 114-590, in lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate. The text of the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the text is as follows: In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate, insert the following: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act''. (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I--CHEMICAL SAFETY Sec. 2. Findings, policy, and intent. Sec. 3. Definitions. Sec. 4. Testing of chemical substances and mixtures. Sec. 5. Manufacturing and processing notices. Sec. 6. Prioritization, risk evaluation, and regulation of chemical substances and mixtures. Sec. 7. Imminent hazards. Sec. 8. Reporting and retention of information. Sec. 9. Relationship to other Federal laws. Sec. 10. Exports of elemental mercury. Sec. 11. Confidential information. Sec. 12. Penalties. Sec. 13. State-Federal relationship. Sec. 14. Judicial review. Sec. 15. Citizens' civil actions. Sec. 16. Studies. Sec. 17. Administration of the Act. Sec. 18.…
Said by
John Shimkus
Republican · Illinois
Source
govinfo.gov
May 24, 2016

Share

More from John Shimkus

Sep 17, 2020

As folks in the Chamber know, I have been taking some time to thank friends, family, and staff, for supporting me these 24 years as a Member of the House. Today, before I go down the organizational chart and mention caseworkers…

govinfo.gov
Nov 17, 2023

the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must promptly continue with the legally mandated licensing process

congress.gov
Jul 27, 2020

So, to keep cost out of this debate is ridiculous, because it does cost money to meet these standards, and when you try to cheap out, you hurt the very people that you are supposed to locally protect.

congress.gov
Jul 27, 2020

It is critical that if we are going to spend money to make sure our water is safe, we use science and we don't use emotion.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation