While I will not oppose this amendment, this section, in particular, is objectionable. But putting Agency decisions on their website sounds like a reasonable proposal. I am concerned about the timing of 60 days--that would be something that the Agency can do without a problem--and would have preferred that the Agency was invited to testify on sweeping an antiscience bill and its implications. I do not intend to oppose this amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Share
More from John Shimkus
In 1939, Hitler's Nazi Germany and Stalin's Communist Soviet Union signed a secret agreement to invade and create spheres of influence. The Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement allowed Hitler to invade the free and sovereign country of Poland…
So, to keep cost out of this debate is ridiculous, because it does cost money to meet these standards, and when you try to cheap out, you hurt the very people that you are supposed to locally protect.
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission must promptly continue with the legally mandated licensing process
I have heard it said that being a chief of staff to a Member of Congress is one of the best jobs on the Hill. It takes a special person to keep the staff performing at the high level required of them. Burnout could easily occur because of…





