Before I yield to my colleague from North Dakota, let me just respond in that, in the final rule, they didn't close the door to regulating coal ash as toxic. They can re-regulate. They can promulgate a new regulation and then call it toxic. So then you have the fly ash and the concrete in the school and the school has to get torn down because it has got fly ash in it? It makes no sense. So that is why we need to codify the science, which the EPA has twice, now three times, said coal ash is not toxic. I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from North Dakota (Mr. Cramer). {time} 1630
John Shimkus: “Before I yield to my colleague from North Dakota, let me just respond in that, in the final rule, they didn't close the…”
Share
More from John Shimkus
As ranking member on the Subcommittee of Environment and Climate Change, I want to thank Chief Counsel Mary Martin, Deputy Chief Counsel Jerry Couri, and senior professional staff member, Peter Spencer, for their tremendous support of me…
Would your organizations support Federal legislation that would likely result in EPA being forced to regulate numerous contaminants that are present in low concentrations, irrespective of whether such regulation offers meaningful public…
This new round of sanctions should send a clear and direct message that any attempts to interfere with the Belarusian people's inalienable rights to freedom, democracy, and the rule of law will not be tolerated. Mr. Speaker, let it be…





