On the recordJune 13, 2018
Are these new requirements advisable as a legally enforceable part of this program, filling a security gap that does not exist or are they merely an additive burden without security benefits?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Shimkus questions the necessity of proposed new requirements for the CFATS program.
Share
More from John Shimkus
Jul 29, 2020
I thank my colleague for yielding me the time. We should at least comply with the law. I would think that a law- writing body, Congress, and the Appropriations Committee should at least follow the law. Well, again, this rule doesn't do…
Jul 30, 2020
Deb Detmers Fansler, Steve Tomaszewski, and Rodney Davis were all with me politically and governmentally for 24 years. It is now my time to thank them. All three have been great public servants. All three are political addicts. Deb is…
Jul 20, 2020
You know, the clock keeps ticking, and before you know it, my time as a Member of Congress will end, so I need to start now saying thank you to some of those folks who have committed their lives in helping me and supporting me in my…
Jul 29, 2020
What if we don't do this? Here is a chart. Here is Yucca Mountain, secure, in the desert, underneath a mountain, 90 miles from Las Vegas. Right here in this Chamber, we are 44 miles from the nearest nuclear power plant. It just happens to…
Other voices in this conversation
