On the recordJune 13, 2018
Are these new requirements advisable as a legally enforceable part of this program, filling a security gap that does not exist or are they merely an additive burden without security benefits?
Source
congress.govJohn Shimkus: “Are these new requirements advisable as a legally enforceable part of this program, filling a security gap that does not…”
Editor's note · Context
Shimkus questions the necessity of proposed new requirements for the CFATS program.
Share
More from John Shimkus
Nov 17, 2023
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission must promptly continue with the legally mandated licensing process
Jul 27, 2020
Would your organizations support Federal legislation that would likely result in EPA being forced to regulate numerous contaminants that are present in low concentrations, irrespective of whether such regulation offers meaningful public…
Sep 15, 2020
The American people overwhelmingly agree. Recent polling found Americans prioritize affordability and reliability over emissions reductions.
Other voices in this conversation
