How is it that an independent agency with a clear statutory responsibility is criticized by a Federal court for having 'no current intention of complying with the law'?
Editor's note · Context
Shimkus questions the NRC's compliance with legal obligations after court criticism.
Share
More from John Shimkus
I thank my colleague and next-door neighbor from Kentucky for yielding to me. Mr. Speaker, the legislative director, together with the legislative staff, advises congressmen on legislative issues. This position assists in the development…
I oppose the Delgado amendment. Beware of a wolf in sheep's clothing. This is not a technical fix or a clarification of last year's NDAA. There were no colloquies, report language, or public statements rejecting TRI exemptions for PFAS in…
Who has the right to close? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York has the right to close.
Congress declared that quantity was not the true measure of whether EPA was doing its job, but, rather, the quality of the work it was doing.





