I appreciate my colleague bringing that up. I taught high school for 4 years, so education is key. This whole provision of moving to the Paris accord was done without education of the Members of Congress. It was an executive branch decision. We can debate whether the President had the authority or didn't have the authority, but we think what happened was that there was not total buy-in. Had it been presented as an agreement or had it been presented as a treaty, it wouldn't have passed either Chamber. I do agree that education is very, very important. However, I also believe in local control. Republicans will always have a challenge with the Federal Government directing, dictating, and telling our local schools what their curriculum should be. Mr. Chair, that is why I oppose this amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Neguse). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment No. 26 Offered by Mr. Van Drew The Acting CHAIR. It is now in order to consider amendment No. 26 printed in House Report 116-42.
On the recordMay 2, 2019
Share
More from John Shimkus
Nov 18, 2020
Many of us know that the House could not function without the professional nonpartisan personnel who ensure that we can do our job. We do at times as an institution pause and thank them, but now it is time for me to do it personally. I…
Jul 27, 2020
Congress declared that quantity was not the true measure of whether EPA was doing its job, but, rather, the quality of the work it was doing.
Jul 13, 2020
It is no surprise that we have the law of the land for failure of the appropriators to spend the money.
Jul 29, 2020
I have heard it said that being a chief of staff to a Member of Congress is one of the best jobs on the Hill. It takes a special person to keep the staff performing at the high level required of them. Burnout could easily occur because of…





