It is actually insulting and certainly annoying that there is some sort of accusation that those of us who think that the substitute is preferable do not care about women and do not care about the babies that they are carrying. As a mother, as a grandmother of four children, we have to recognize this bill for what it is. If we want to go after protecting pregnant women, we ought to go after protecting pregnant women, not about threatening to take away their right to choose, which this is a thinly veiled effort to do because we are trying to create a special status of human being, of a fetus, of an unborn child. While I kind of admire the strategy, it does not get to the heart of this issue. The proponents say we have to have this bill to protect pregnant women from violence, but the truth is this bill does not even address crimes committed against the woman at all, it only addresses the new crime created in this bill, which is a crime against a zygote, an embryo, a fetus.
Janice Schakowsky: “It is actually insulting and certainly annoying that there is some sort of accusation that those of us who think that…”
On the recordFebruary 26, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Debating the implications of a bill related to the rights of pregnant women and fetal protection.
Share
More from Janice Schakowsky
May 27, 2026
The American people overwhelmingly do not want another war in the Middle East, and the last thing our country needs is to be drawn into a conflict that would cost lives and destabilize the region.
Dec 12, 2023
I was otherwise detained and unable to vote today. Had I been present, I would have voted in the following manner: ``nay'' on rollcall No. 710, ``nay'' on rollcall No. 711, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 712, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 713, ``yea''…
Apr 13, 2025
If I do indeed decide to retire, there are dozens of talented leaders... ready to lead the charge.





