The only thing one could think of is that for some reason, that the vice president's chief of staff did not tell him or something like that, but it seems to me if anyone feels the necessity to check with the vice president's office, whether or not he was involved directly in conversation, then I think the American people need to question that connection. Why would anybody need to do that or feel the need to do that? This is very important. Let me just say this. We talk a lot about separation of church and State, but in some ways this lack of separation between corporations that are looking to make profits and the public interest, and what our mandate and the mandate of all elected officials is to protect the public interest. This blurring of those divisions is very, very troubling. Are the interests of private corporations going right up to the vice president's office? That is a worthwhile thing for Americans to know about.
Janice Schakowsky: “The only thing one could think of is that for some reason, that the vice president's chief of staff did not tell him or…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the relationship between corporate interests and government during a debate.
Share
More from Janice Schakowsky
Abandoning that approach in favor of reckless escalation puts lives, security, and regional stability at risk.
‘Do not call’ means do not call. Period. But illegitimate and intrusive robocalls are only getting worse, especially as scammers weaponize AI to impersonate loved ones and exploit Americans. So many of us are bombarded with relentless…
I fought for and continue to defend the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which proved that diplomacy, not war, can constrain Iran’s nuclear program and keep Americans safe.
As energy costs soar, we can’t risk letting bad actors rig the electricity market to line their own pockets at the expense of families.





