I rise in support of H.R. 3136, and particularly title III of that bill, the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. Title III, as amended by the rule, is patterned after the provisions of S. 942, legislation sponsored by Senator Christopher Bond of Missouri, which passed the Senate on March 19 by the vote of 100 to 0. It would provide important regulatory relief for America's small businesses. This measure is vitally important to the small business community, which is particularly burdened by the effect of multiple, and many times conflicting, regulatory requirements. It should be viewed not as a total solution to all regulatory problems, but as a good first step of making rules more fair, more rational, and more carefully tailored to achieve the goal they are designed to accomplish. First, title III proposes important changes in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, allowing judicial review of certain aspects of that statute.
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 during House floor debate.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I was simply going to suggest to my good friend, Mr. Berman, that while you are looking for patterns of conduct, think of the Libya example. Mr. Khadaffi might just turn in all their weapons. That is entirely possible.
if I may reclaim my time, I want to say to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gohmert), this is a marvelous amendment. The spirit in which it is offered is exemplary, and it is a very difficult thing to oppose it. But I see a problem with it…
while there may be some provisions in the Menendez substitute that are worthy of discussion during conference, I still rise in opposition to his amendment. Our review of the Commission's report was performed with a seriousness and a…
that is what I think of the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos). Mr. Chairman, I just want to point out that substantial compliance is accorded to the Secretary of State, so if 38 of the 39 are complied with, the 39th could have been…





