The redefining of a new rule makes for retroactivity and multiple petitions under a lower standard of proof are permissible under the Derrick amendment. This is a giant leap backwards. I am still waiting for Janet Reno's letter recommending your amendment.
Henry Hyde: “The redefining of a new rule makes for retroactivity and multiple petitions under a lower standard of proof are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the Derrick amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
The more valuable our dissent into weakness, dissension and inaction, the greater the aid and comfort we give to our enemies.
I certainly would like to prevent, if I could legally, anybody having an abortion--a rich woman, a middle-class woman, or a poor woman.
That is what I think of the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos). Mr. Chairman, I just want to point out that substantial compliance is accorded to the Secretary of State, so if 38 of the 39 are complied with, the 39th could have been…
This is a killer amendment. If you vote for it, you vote to kill this entire initiative, because this imposes limits on India's nuclear weapons program, but India already possesses nuclear weapons and is extremely unlikely to give them up…





