Mr. Chairman, I yield myself 1 minute. I just wish to say, we are talking about punitive damages, which can have a serious impact on the economy, on jobs. They can extend, and do extend, well beyond the borders of a State. The purpose of this legislation is to standardize, as much as possible, in a fair way, the elements of proof that impact on our economy. If we want to have 50 patchwork sets of laws to deal with the economy and deal with products liability, why, I suppose we can. But the purpose of this legislation is to assist manufacturers, to give some certitude, some predictability, to do away with lawsuit abuse, forum shopping. Therefore, I must resist the gentleman's amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of punitive damages and the need for standardized legislation.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I enclose two letters relating to the consideration of H.R. 3100 The East Asia Security Act.'' House of Representatives, Committee on International Relations, Washington, DC, July 12, 2005. Hon. Bill Thomas, Chairman, House Committee on…
the right to vote--democracy itself--is more than a way to settle disputes, however petty or important. It is, rather, the embodiment of a larger, much more important notion: the notion that every individual is worthwhile; that every…
I thank Mr. Ehlers. I appreciate your warm, gracious words. There is a story that goes around in my hometown, Chicago. It says, Bury me when I die in Chicago because I want to stay active in politics after I am gone. This is not the…
someone once said brevity is the soul of eloquence. I shall attempt to emulate that by saying we are happy to accept this excellent amendment.





