I yield myself 30 seconds, simply to comment how enjoyable it is to be instructed on questions of jurisdiction and service of process from Mr. Justice Dingell. He just short-circuited the real issue, which is jurisdiction, not where you serve process. Jurisdiction under the amendment under discussion is bad, it states, The Federal court in which such action is brought shall have jurisdiction over such manufacture if the manufacturer knew or reasonably should have known that the product would be imported for sale or use in the United States. That does not apply to any domestic corporation, and it is not boilerplate. It is something radically different.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing jurisdiction issues related to a proposed amendment during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
The more valuable our dissent into weakness, dissension and inaction, the greater the aid and comfort we give to our enemies.
I think the use of these cards is very misleading. It facilitates money laundering, and it is completely out of the spirit of the PATRIOT Act. Therefore, with extreme regret because I do not think I have ever disagreed with the gentleman…
It is a privilege to speak in honor of the life and the achievements of His Holiness Pope John Paul II. It is hard to imagine any other person who holds so much worldwide respect regardless of religious faith. The estimated 4 million…
the question was asked, whose side are we on? I am on the side of the family. It seems to me the practice of ferreting some pregnant girl who is a minor out across the State line so that parents will not know about it is an assault on the…





