I just want to simply say in Vietnam there was not a bullet shot, there was not a gun held by a GI, that was not authorized and paid for by this Congress, and this Congress can stop it, or can make it go ahead any time it wants. I suggest again to the gentleman that my amendment requires us to know, to be in at the take-off as well as the landing, to be not only informed but to be given reports, periodic reports. Then we have the power to stop it or go ahead, and be a full partner. We would be the dominating partner, because the President cannot wage war without our funding it. Lastly, the lesson of Vietnam, to anybody who is not deaf, dumb, and blind, is that you cannot carry on a war without the support of the people. That means the support of Congress. We are, under the Constitution, under the power to appropriate and raise the money and spend it, we are full partners. We are the senior partner with the executive.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing congressional authority and responsibility regarding military actions during a debate.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
the election of Hamas to a majority within the Palestinian Legislative Council and to the formation of a terrorist organization-led government in the Palestinian Authority poses a serious challenge to the United States and its allies. The…
an unrelenting Government assault on property rights, fueled by a dangerous and emotional vigilante mentality that sanctions shredding the U.S. Constitution into meaningless confetti.
that is what I think of the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos). Mr. Chairman, I just want to point out that substantial compliance is accorded to the Secretary of State, so if 38 of the 39 are complied with, the 39th could have been…
The final report of the 9/11 Commission made recommendations on how best to confront the threat of terrorism in the 21st century. Of these 44 recommendations, one-third of them fell within the jurisdiction of the House Committee on…





