I wanted to respond to my friend, the gentleman from Massachusetts, who is one of the very effective but selective crusaders for States' rights. This is a search for information, this commission, not legislative nor regulatory functions, but a search for information that has a uniquely national characteristic. The States, important as they are, are really not competent to do a national search that involves the issue of gambling. So, it may be an intrusion, but it is really not an either/or proposition: States' rights versus national intrusion. This subject lends itself to national study. Some things are best done by the States. Some things are best done by the Federal Government, and it is pretty hard to have a hard and fast rule. Generally, we Republicans prefer local government over national government, but that, again, depends on the circumstance. Tort reform, for example, in my judgment, and although I do not speak for all my colleagues on the Republican side, lent itself to a national solution rather than a State solution.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the balance between state and federal roles in addressing gambling issues.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
Well, I will not abuse the privilege. Let us get the whole story out on Mr. Gingrich, what he says about withholding. On Wednesday, at the press conference held with himself and Senator Mitchell, Mr. Gingrich stated that he ``supports Mr…
The more valuable our dissent into weakness, dissension and inaction, the greater the aid and comfort we give to our enemies.
I simply want to say, in response to my friend, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Lee), that contempt is not animating our legislation, and I really question the wisdom of penetrating motives, which seems to be a habit with some people…
I am very pleased to offer H. Res. 744, which expresses support for the Good Friday Agreement as the blueprint for lasting peace in Northern Ireland and support for continued police reform in Northern Ireland as a critical element in the…





