abhorrent as the remarks of the speaker at Kean College in New Jersey were, I do not think enough attention is being given to the enthusiastic response that his hateful words received from his college student audience. The applause of those young people scares me a lot more than the idiotic statements that were made by this person, and I think that there is an awful lot of work to be done to understand why such language has such an appeal to so many young people. Mr. Speaker, the language of this resolution does not call for any civilian or criminal penalties. It does, however, flatly express the sense of Congress that the deliberate abuse of another's deeply held beliefs and the systematic abuse of another's deeply held beliefs and the systematic condemnation of persons based on ethnicity, race, or religion is an offense to democratic civility, and this resolution is an expression of our right of freedom of speech to condemn what we find patently contemptible.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the impact of hateful speech and the response it receives from young audiences.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
The more valuable our dissent into weakness, dissension and inaction, the greater the aid and comfort we give to our enemies.
I ask unanimous consent that during further consideration of House Resolution 611 , the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption without intervening motion except: (1) debate on the resolution…
Members of this Committee know the story of how Congressman Henry Hyde changed his mind when the 1982 reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act was in play by virtue of the facts and the testimony that he saw.
I believe the President was right yesterday when he said members of the House should cast a vote of principle and conscience'' on authorizing the impeachment inquiry.





