I just again revert to the language of the amendment offered by the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Hancock]. It says, ``* * * shall implement or carry out a program or activity that has either the purpose,'' and I know the words that trouble the gentleman, ``or effect of encouraging or supporting homosexuality as a positive lifestyle alternative.'' I think that fits what the gentleman himself has said is not----
Discussing an amendment related to programs that may support homosexuality.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I was simply going to suggest to my good friend, Mr. Berman, that while you are looking for patterns of conduct, think of the Libya example. Mr. Khadaffi might just turn in all their weapons. That is entirely possible.
On May 11, 2006, I was absent for the following procedural votes. Had I been present, I would have voted: Rollcall No. 137, on motion to adjourn, ``nay''; Rollcall No. 138, on motion to adjourn, ``nay.'' ____________________
I certainly would like to prevent, if I could legally, anybody having an abortion--a rich woman, a middle-class woman, or a poor woman.
An unrelenting Government assault on property rights, fueled by a dangerous and emotional vigilante mentality that sanctions shredding the U.S. Constitution into meaningless confetti.
Other voices in this conversation
