I do not defend obstructionism. I do not defend intimidation, interfering with people who are exercising their constitutional rights, and tragically under our law a woman has a constitutional right to go into an abortion mill and exterminate her unborn child. She has that right tragically, and to try and stop her, to try and intimidate her, I think is a violation of the law and ought to be punished. I am prepared to do that. But let us treat that violation as we would a labor dispute, as we would an environmental dispute, as we would a civil liberties dispute, a military dispute. Why just single out the one cause, and because their motives are to defend unborn children they become a felon, and somebody else becomes guilty of a misdemeanor. That is not the American way. Our purpose here tonight is to focus attention on equal protection of the law and remind Members that they took an oath to defend that concept, and this bill violates it.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of a bill related to abortion rights and equal protection under the law.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
Well, I will not abuse the privilege. Let us get the whole story out on Mr. Gingrich, what he says about withholding. On Wednesday, at the press conference held with himself and Senator Mitchell, Mr. Gingrich stated that he ``supports Mr…
after 7 years of work on anti-narcotic efforts in Colombia, we are now seeing the fruits of our labors in the drug wars. Americans, and especially our young people, are greatly benefiting here at home from our policies in Colombia and the…
I certainly would like to prevent, if I could legally, anybody having an abortion--a rich woman, a middle-class woman, or a poor woman.
an unrelenting Government assault on property rights, fueled by a dangerous and emotional vigilante mentality that sanctions shredding the U.S. Constitution into meaningless confetti.





