Mr. Chairman, if the States were doing everything right, we would not have all this furor about truth-in-sentencing. The truth of the matter is, 10 years does not mean 10 years; 15 years does not mean 15 years. The public thinks it does, but they are learning that it does not. We are trying to use a concept that is alien to some people in this Chamber. It is called incentives. It works in economics, and it works in crime fighting. The gentleman from Massachusetts said somehow a pall of depression falls over us Republicans when the Democrat administration does something right. I would just tell the gentleman: NAFTA and GATT. When the administration does something right, and it does--it does--they get support from this side of the aisle. But the romance with categorical grants has been on their side. I recall the last crime bill, the so-called omnibus crime bill, if you wanted to get a piece of that $50 million, you had to have midnight basketball. You had to shoot free throws, because that was a Federal program and you had to participate. We were telling communities. ``If you want some of this money, then here's a program where you can get it.'' But what we are doing here is saying here is money to build prisons. If you want to build prisons, let we have truth-in-sentencing. That is a simple exchange. It is not asking too much. I think this is what the public wants.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing truth-in-sentencing and its implications during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I enclose two letters relating to the consideration of H.R. 3100 The East Asia Security Act.'' House of Representatives, Committee on International Relations, Washington, DC, July 12, 2005. Hon. Bill Thomas, Chairman, House Committee on…
on May 11, 2006, I was absent for the following procedural votes. Had I been present, I would have voted: Rollcall No. 137, on motion to adjourn, ``nay''; Rollcall No. 138, on motion to adjourn, ``nay.'' ____________________
that is what I think of the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos). Mr. Chairman, I just want to point out that substantial compliance is accorded to the Secretary of State, so if 38 of the 39 are complied with, the 39th could have been…
I announce my difficulty in opposing my good friends, Mr. Berman and Mrs. Tauscher. They are both very learned in this field. However, this amendment is very similar to Mr. Sherman's amendment and should be defeated for virtually the same…





