I am trying to make this a workable provision. Under the law that we are about to reauthorize, the preliminary investigation threshold question was too low. I want to raise that threshold, not lower it. I do not want political manipulation of the independent counsel law, nor the Office of Attorney General. I want the trigger, the threshold of the preliminary investigation, not to have to happen unless there is specific evidence from a credible source of a violation of a Federal law. The complicated machinery of the independent counsel law should not get underway unless there is real evidence of possible wrongdoing. I am simply raising the threshold.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about the threshold for preliminary investigations under the independent counsel law.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
pursuant to the rule, I call up the resolution (H. Res. 571) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the deployment of United States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately, and ask for its immediate consideration in the…
I enclose two letters relating to the consideration of H.R. 3100 The East Asia Security Act.'' House of Representatives, Committee on International Relations, Washington, DC, July 12, 2005. Hon. Bill Thomas, Chairman, House Committee on…
I rise in support of H.R. 5682, the U.S.- India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act of 2006, which the Committee on International Relations ordered reported by a vote of 37-5 on June 28. This, therefore, is truly a bipartisan effort. This…
I thank Mr. Ehlers. I appreciate your warm, gracious words. There is a story that goes around in my hometown, Chicago. It says, Bury me when I die in Chicago because I want to stay active in politics after I am gone. This is not the…





