I am trying to make this a workable provision. Under the law that we are about to reauthorize, the preliminary investigation threshold question was too low. I want to raise that threshold, not lower it. I do not want political manipulation of the independent counsel law, nor the Office of Attorney General. I want the trigger, the threshold of the preliminary investigation, not to have to happen unless there is specific evidence from a credible source of a violation of a Federal law. The complicated machinery of the independent counsel law should not get underway unless there is real evidence of possible wrongdoing. I am simply raising the threshold.
Henry Hyde: “I am trying to make this a workable provision. Under the law that we are about to reauthorize, the preliminary…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about the threshold for preliminary investigations under the independent counsel law.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I think our politics has suffered. I hope not a mortal blow, but certainly a serious blow. The name calling, the negativity, the throwing of mud, the institution of the White House, the presidency, and Congress itself. People are looking…
I announce my difficulty in opposing my good friends, Mr. Berman and Mrs. Tauscher. They are both very learned in this field. However, this amendment is very similar to Mr. Sherman's amendment and should be defeated for virtually the same…
Someone once said brevity is the soul of eloquence. I shall attempt to emulate that by saying we are happy to accept this excellent amendment.
On May 11, 2006, I was absent for the following procedural votes. Had I been present, I would have voted: Rollcall No. 137, on motion to adjourn, ``nay''; Rollcall No. 138, on motion to adjourn, ``nay.'' ____________________





