I think terrorists who kill ought to die, and they ought not to linger for 16 or 17 years. That is why habeas corpus is in there. I commend the text of the bill to my friend. He said one cabinet officer can come up with a list of terrorist organizations. No, it is the Secretary of State in conjunction with the Attorney General. That is two, the last time I looked. They come up with the evidence, they submit it to Congress, the facts behind it, and a judicial review is available to the organization or the person.
Henry Hyde: “I think terrorists who kill ought to die, and they ought not to linger for 16 or 17 years. That is why habeas corpus is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to terrorism and habeas corpus.
Share
More from Henry Hyde
I was simply going to suggest to my good friend, Mr. Berman, that while you are looking for patterns of conduct, think of the Libya example. Mr. Khadaffi might just turn in all their weapons. That is entirely possible.
If I may reclaim my time, I want to say to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Gohmert), this is a marvelous amendment. The spirit in which it is offered is exemplary, and it is a very difficult thing to oppose it. But I see a problem with it…
On May 11, 2006, I was absent for the following procedural votes. Had I been present, I would have voted: Rollcall No. 137, on motion to adjourn, ``nay''; Rollcall No. 138, on motion to adjourn, ``nay.'' ____________________
I announce my difficulty in opposing my good friends, Mr. Berman and Mrs. Tauscher. They are both very learned in this field. However, this amendment is very similar to Mr. Sherman's amendment and should be defeated for virtually the same…





